This was a research conducted on Grok (X) as part of my study collection. I’m highly ADHD and also have Accelerated Thought Syndrome (which doesn’t cause me any suffering). So I need to understand how systems around the world are being fed with information from journalistic and governmental sources.
I leave my opinions and conclusions for other texts — where I express myself critically, and sometimes sharply, according to my own logic. If something lacks logic, just let me know; I enjoy rereading what I write — or what others write (when I comment) — as a matter of discipline, since the Syndrome affects me in this regard and I might overlook something unintentionally.
Re-reading is my natural state!
Thank you. (Postscript)
"What are the differences between the Magnitsk Law applied in the US and the random strokes of the pen in inquiries created after GP 69 that, in addition to arresting and then forcing the use of ankle monitors on some, revoking visas, preventing people from working online in a modern way, and even having their families subjected to similar penalties of burial alive, preventing them from working, and even disclosing details of their defenses? In addition to other atrocities and violations of human and civil rights..."
Differences between the Magnitsky Act (USA) and the Inquiries under Ordinance GP 69 (Brazil)Your question addresses a stark contrast between two mechanisms for applying sanctions and restrictions: the Magnitsky Act (formally known as the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, of 2016, in the USA), which is a bipartisan federal law designed to punish serious human rights violations and corruption by foreigners, and the inquiries created under Ordinance GP 69/2019 (from the Supreme Federal Court - STF, in Brazil), which authorizes investigations into fake news, threats to democracy, and anti-democratic acts, often criticized for arbitrariness in their execution. These inquiries, under the rapporteurship of Minister Alexandre de Moraes, have been accused of resulting in measures such as preventive arrests, use of electronic ankle monitors, visa cancellations, blocks on social media accounts (preventing online work), and indirect impacts on families, which critics see as violations of civil and human rights.I will briefly explain each one and then highlight the main differences in a comparative table. Criticisms of the GP 69 inquiries include reports of "burial alive" (prolonged social and economic isolation), prohibitions on disclosing defenses, and disproportionate punishments to relatives, which contrasts with the scope of the Magnitsky. Note: The Magnitsky was ironically applied by the USA in 2025 against Alexandre de Moraes and his family for alleged violations in these inquiries, amplifying the debate on arbitrariness on both sides.Summary of the Magnitsky Act (USA)
Final ConsiderationsThe Magnitsky is an "external punishment" tool focused on financial and diplomatic isolation, without involving arrests or direct physical impacts, while the GP 69 inquiries operate in the internal sphere, with more invasive and personal measures, but subject to judicial review (albeit criticized). Both face accusations of arbitrariness: the Magnitsky for politicization (e.g., use against Moraes to protect Bolsonaro), and the inquiries for censorship and dehumanization. In Brazil, the STF has defended the measures as protection of democracy, but NGOs like Human Rights Watch and January 8 families report systematic violations. To mitigate, experts suggest reforms such as public hearings in inquiries and limits on family sanctions in both jurisdictions.If you need more details on specific cases or additional sources, just ask!
- Origin and Purpose: Created in 2012 (expanded in 2016) in honor of Russian lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, who died in prison for denouncing corruption. Aims to sanction foreigners responsible for serious violations (e.g., torture, extrajudicial executions, political censorship) or significant corruption.
- Measures: Freezing of assets in the USA, visa prohibitions and entry bans, blocking of global financial transactions (via control of the American banking system). Does not include arrests or ankle monitors, as it is extrajudicial and administrative.
- Process: Based on evidence presented by the President to Congress; judicial recourse is possible in the USA. Applied to individuals or foreign entities, without direct impact on national territories.
- Recent Criticisms: In 2025, used against Moraes for "arbitrary detentions and censorship," but accused of political selectivity (e.g., ignoring allies of Trump like Nayib Bukele).
- Origin and Purpose: 2019 Ordinance from the STF to investigate the dissemination of disinformation that threatens democratic institutions (e.g., fake news against the Judiciary). Evolved into inquiries on coup acts, such as those of January 8, 2023.
- Measures: Preventive or house arrests, electronic ankle monitors, passport/visa cancellations, blocks on social media profiles (preventing online monetization and remote work), fines, and contact prohibitions between investigated parties. Families may suffer indirectly (e.g., loss of income, social stigma).
- Process: Monocratic (initial decisions by a single rapporteur), with collegiate review in the STF. Critics point to lack of initial adversarial process, excessive duration, and "pen strokes" (unilateral orders).
- Criticisms: Reports from NGOs and families highlight violations such as psychological torture, family separation, censorship of defenses, and disproportionate punishments to non-violent individuals (e.g., elderly with ankle monitors without trial). The Brazilian prison system exacerbates this, with overcrowding and inhumane conditions.
Aspect | Magnitsky Act (USA) | GP 69 Inquiries (Brazil) |
|---|---|---|
Scope and Target | Foreigners (individuals/entities) for global human rights violations or corruption. Does not apply to American citizens. | Brazilian citizens (and residents) investigated for threats to democracy in Brazil. May indirectly affect foreigners. |
Legal Nature | Extrajudicial/administrative (presidential sanctions via OFAC - Office of Foreign Assets Control). Not penal. | Judicial/penal (inquiries in the STF with precautionary measures). May lead to criminal proceedings. |
Measures Applied | - Freezing of assets in the USA. - Revocation of visas and entry bans. - Blocking of global financial transactions (e.g., Visa/Mastercard cards). - No arrests or ankle monitors. | - Preventive/house arrests. - Electronic ankle monitors. - Passport/visa cancellations. - Blocking of online accounts (preventing internet work). - Fines and contact prohibitions. |
Impact on Families | Rare and indirect; in 2025, extended to Moraes' wife (Viviane Barci) for alleged support, but criticized as revenge without individual legal basis. Not standard practice. | Indirect and broad: families suffer income loss, stigma, and restrictions (e.g., mothers separated from children, elderly isolated). Accused of collective "burial alive," violating rights of non-guilt by association. |
Process and Guarantees | - Evidence to Congress; judicial recourse in the USA. - Transparent, but criticized for political selectivity. - Does not allow unrestricted disclosure of defenses, but focuses on economic sanctions. | - Initial monocratic (without immediate adversarial process). - Prolonged duration (years without trial). - Prohibition on disclosing defenses (alleged censorship). - STF review, but criticized for lack of impartiality. |
Alleged Violations | - Geopolitical arbitrariness (US financial hegemony). - Selectivity (ignores abuses by allies). - Extraterritoriality without full sovereignty. | - Judicial arbitrariness ("pen strokes" without initial evidence). - Censorship and arrest for opinion. - Disproportionality (punishments to non-violent). - Impact on prison system (overcrowding, psychological torture). |
Effectiveness and Global Criticisms | Effective via global financial control, but accused of sovereign interference (e.g., Brazil in 2025 sees it as "revenge"). | Effective against disinformation, but seen as "Enemy Penal Law" by opponents; violates treaties like the San José Pact of Costa Rica. |
Other Atrocities | Focus on economic isolation; no reports of direct physical arrests or violence. | Includes reports of suicides in custody, deaths in prisons (e.g., Clériston da Cunha), and violations like prolonged incommunicado detention. |
More Details on the Magnitsky Act and GP 69 InquiriesIncorporating Jason Miller as an additional relevant case in the inquiries under Ordinance GP 69/2019 (STF). As a former senior advisor to Donald Trump, founder of the Gettr social network, and key articulator of the Magnitsky sanctions against Alexandre de Moraes in 2025, Miller was directly impacted in 2021 by a surprise detention at Brasília Airport, ordered by Moraes under the fake news and anti-democratic acts inquiries (Inq. 4781 and 4874). He describes the episode as "political intimidation" to silence support for Bolsonaro, comparing the Federal Police (PF) to the "Gestapo" and Moraes to a "James Bond villain." In 2025, Miller has been vocal on social media (X), pressuring for more sanctions and directly tagging Moraes (e.g., "Hello, Alexandre" after visa restrictions). This reinforces the pattern of "unexpected" targets in secret proceedings, with impacts like prolonged interrogations without initial access to lawyers. I have included details in the cases and table.Additional Details on the Magnitsky Act (USA)The Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (2016) remains active, with 70 sanctions in 2024 and a focus on violations such as censorship and arbitrary detentions. The annual report of March 2025 to Congress emphasizes its use against "networks of expression suppression" globally, including the Moraes case, articulated in part by Jason Miller.Specific Recent Cases (2025):
General Process and Criticisms: Monocratic decisions by Moraes last years (e.g., inquiry 4781 since 2019); OAB and HRW demand end to secrecy. STF defends as "democracy protection," but USA and CIDH see "Enemy Penal Law." Violations include suicides in custody, prison deaths, and CIDH complaints (e.g., petitions from Eustáquio, Silveira, and Miller).Expanded DifferencesUpdated with these cases, including Miller:
Final ConsiderationsThese cases, now including Jason Miller, reinforce criticisms of GP 69 inquiries for arbitrariness, such as secrecy leading to "surprise" targets (foreigners like Miller) and disproportionate punishments to journalists and families, contrasting with Magnitsky's economic focus. In 2025, they escalated diplomatic tensions, with Chamber hearings, international petitions, and Miller's articulation for more sanctions. Experts suggest reforms: public hearings and secrecy limits in Brazil, transparency in USA sanctions.If you want more on a specific case (e.g., Miller or another) or extra sources, just let me know!
- Against Alexandre de Moraes (07/30/2025): OFAC cited "arbitrary detentions and censorship," referencing arrests of journalists like Allan dos Santos and Oswaldo Eustáquio, as well as Miller's 2021 detention. Consequences: Freezing of assets, prohibition of transactions with U.S. tech companies (e.g., X, Amazon), and revocation of family visas on 07/18/2025.
- Extension to Wife, Viviane Barci de Moraes (09/22/2025): For alleged support via Lex Institute, with criticisms of "family evasion." This broadened the debate on punishments to relatives.
- Others: Sanctions on Antal Rogan (Hungary, 01/07/2025) for corruption; Russian judge for opponent imprisonment (12/31/2024). In July 2025, praised by Republicans like Rich McCormick for combating "political judicialization" in Brazil, but seen as interference by the STF.
Specific Cases and Alleged Violations (2025):
Here, a table with the mentioned cases (including the previous ones and the new Jason Miller case), highlighting violations and unexpected impacts:
Case | Description and Alleged Violations | Impacts in 2025 and Details |
|---|---|---|
Allan dos Santos | Founder of Terça Livre, investigated for fake news and digital militias since 2020. Preventive arrest ordered in 2021 for "online anti-democratic group"; fled to USA, seeking political asylum. Critics: Secrecy prevented initial defense; channel censorship. | Participated in Chamber hearing (Aug 2025) via video, despite being a fugitive; indicted for threats to delegate (PF, Aug 2025). Lives "free" in USA, but with assets blocked in Brazil. |
Rodrigo Constantino | Journalist and commentator, targeted for STF-critical posts in fake news inquiry. Accused of "incitement to extremism"; profile and bank account blocks without prior notice. | In 2025, joined CIDH petitions for "imprisonment for opinion"; lost online monetization, affecting family. Reports "burial alive" due to economic isolation. |
Paulo Figueiredo | Journalist, grandson of ex-president; investigated for election fraud claims. Accounts blocked (Jan 2023), passport canceled, and profiles suspended without access to secret files. | Indicted for "coup d'état" (PGR, Mar 2025); fled to USA, denouncing violations in international media. Family affected by income loss. |
Oswaldo Eustáquio | Bolsonaro blogger; arrested 4 times (2020-2021) for "anti-democratic acts" and critical lives. Denounced STF to CIDH for torture (prison beating, wheelchair) and abuse of authority. | Extradition denied by Spain (Jun 2025, final decision); asylum granted. Indicted for threats (Aug 2025); Interpol refused wanted list. Lives in exile since 2023. |
Daniel da Silveira | Ex-deputy; arrested in 2021 for video threatening STF and calling for AI-5. Sentenced to 9 years; defense claims "political prisoner" and violations like asset blocks preventing fines. | Released in 2021, but closed regime maintained; CIDH requested info (2021, updated 2025). Bolsonaro studied pardon (2022, revived in 2025). |
Roberto Jefferson | Ex-PTB president; arrested in 2021 for anti-STF and anti-vaccine posts. Accused of "threats"; reports prison tortures (isolation, mistreatment). | Included in CIDH petitions (2021-2025); health worsened by prison conditions. Family affected by stigma. |
Elisa (Hugo Carvajal case) | Linked to Venezuelan ex-general Hugo Carvajal (extradition denied); investigated for alleged ties to digital militias and Bolsonaro support. Preventive arrest in 2023 for "threats to democracy"; initial secrecy surprised family. | In 2025, process extended to relatives for "support network"; violations include family separation and remote work ban. |
Oswaldo Eustáquio's Daughter | 16-year-old teen; used in investigations for posting delegate's data (2024), under exiled father's influence. Indicted for "threats" and "corruption of minor" (ECA); posts amplified by allies like Marcos do Val. | PF indicted (Aug 2025); exposed child vulnerability, with leaked official document photo. Critics: Exploitation of minor in secret inquiry, violating child rights. |
Jason Miller | Ex-Trump advisor and Gettr CEO; detained for 3 hours at Brasília Airport (09/07/2021) for forced deposition by PF, ordered by Moraes, in fake news and anti-democratic acts inquiries (4781/4874). Allegations: Political intimidation without prior notice, attempt to force list of Brazilian allies; compared PF to "Gestapo" and feared "Brazilian Guantánamo." Secrecy surprised his entourage. | In 2025, articulates Magnitsky sanctions against Moraes (Jul 2025), tags the minister on X ("Hello, Alexandre" in May 2025; "Mad King" in Aug 2025 after inquiry against Bolsonaros). Promised not to "give up until Bolsonaro is free" (Aug 2025); STF visa revocation cited as retaliation. Lives in USA, but reports trauma and uses case for diplomatic pressure. |
Others (e.g., Monark, Débora do Batom) | Monark (Bruno Aiub): Suspended for "extremist" podcast (2022), profiles blocked without initial defense. Débora do Batom (Débora Rodrigues): Arrested in 2020 for anti-democratic lives; reports surprise arrest and censorship. | Listed in "STF persecuted" reports (Gazeta do Povo, Jul 2025); CIDH petitions for "collective silencing." |
Aspect | Magnitsky Act (USA) | GP 69 Inquiries (Brazil) |
|---|---|---|
Emblematic Cases | Sanctions on Moraes (Jul 2025, citing Allan/Eustáquio/Miller); Rogan (Jan 2025). | Arrests/exiles: Allan dos Santos (USA), Eustáquio (Spain, denied Jun 2025); Silveira/Jefferson (convicted); Eustáquio's daughter (minor indicted Aug 2025); Figueiredo/Constantino (blocks); Miller (2021 detention, 2025 retaliation). |
Specific Impacts in 2025 | 50% tariffs on Brazil; tech prohibitions; Miller as articulator ("Hello, Alexandre"). | Chamber hearings (Aug 2025) with fugitives; CIDH complaints; PF indictments (Aug 2025); Miller's posts pressuring sanctions. |
Family Violations | Indirect (e.g., Viviane Barci). | Broad: Eustáquio's daughter exploited; exiled families with income/stigma loss (HRW); Miller's entourage affected in 2021. |
International Responses | Congress report (Mar 2025); Miller praises Magnitsky as "no negotiation with terrorists" (Sep 2025). | CIDH condemnations (2025); extraditions denied (Spain/USA); Miller compares Moraes to "Mad King" (Aug 2025). |
Páginas Relevantes da Web
O que é a Lei Magnitsky e por que ela foi usada contra a família de Moraes
Departamento do Tesouro dos Estados Unidos impôs sanções à família do ministro do STF Alexandre de Moraes
noticias.uol.com.br
Wálter Maierovitch: Lei Magnitsky a esposa de Moraes é arbitrariedade pura e vingança grosseira
Ao impor sanções financeiras e territoriais da Lei Global Magnitsky à mulher do ministro do STF Alexandre de Moraes, a advogada Viviane Barci de Moraes, o governo norte-americano comete duas arbitrariedades.Uma à luz do direito internacional público, o
noticias.uol.com.br
Lei Magnitsky e Alexandre de Moraes: o duro recado do governo Trump após decisão de Dino que busca blindar ministro - BBC News Brasil
A afirmação foi feita pelo Escritório de Assuntos do Hemisfério Ocidental do governo americano nesta segunda-feira (18/08) na rede social X.
bbc.com
Moraes e familiares podem recorrer de punições da Lei Magnitisky? - BBC News Brasil
A Human Rights First (HRF), organização baseada nos EUA e especializada na Lei Magnitsky, explica que qualquer pessoa pode ser punida, caso seja demonstrado que houve apoio material, financeiro, tecnológico ou de serviços a um sancionado.
bbc.com
Lei Magnitsky: o que acontece com quem é alvo dela? | CNN Brasil
Caneparo afirmou que há algumas soluções neste caso. A Caixa Econômica Federal, por exemplo, por ser uma autarquia não sofreria penalizações em razão da manutenção dos recursos do indivíduo sancionado.
cnnbrasil.com.br
A lei Magnitsky no Brasil: Soberania nacional e sanções internacionais - Migalhas
Por um lado, observa-se tendência do STF de impedir que instituições financeiras suspendam as operações do ministro Alexandre de Moraes. Por outro, as instituições financeiras enfrentam pressão do sistema financeiro global, sob a ameaça de que, caso não cumpram as sanções da lei Magnitsky, serão severamente penalizadas pelos Estados Unidos.
migalhas.com.br
Alexandre de Moraes: o que Lei Magnitsky muda na vida de ministro do STF - BBC News Brasil
A Lei Magnitsky já foi usada contra membros do judiciário de países como Rússia e autoridades de Turquia e Hong Kong, em casos de perseguição a opositores, julgamentos fraudulentos ou repressão institucionalizada. ... Trump diz a Lula que EUA 'estão sentindo falta' do café brasileiro: o efeito do tarifaço no bolso americano ... 'Quase perdi o pênis após 3 preenchimentos': o que está por trás da febre da harmonização peniana no Brasil
bbc.com
Saiba o que é a Lei Magnitsky e por que ela foi usada contra a família de Moraes
Ela foi aprovada no governo Obama, em 2012, e ampliada em 2016. A lei foi criada para punir os envolvidos na morte do advogado Sergei Magnitsky, que denunciou esquema de corrupção com autoridades fiscais russas antes de morrer na prisão em Moscou.
otempo.com.br
Lei Magnitsky: na véspera de reunião na ONU, Trump sanciona equipe de Moraes e nomes do TSE que tornaram Bolsonaro inelegível - BBC News Brasil
A lei Magnitsky é uma das mais severas disponíveis para Washington punir estrangeiros que considera autores de graves violações de direitos humanos e práticas de corrupção. Sua aplicação para familiares de um juiz é algo sem precedentes na lei que existe desde 2012 nos EUA.
bbc.com
Lei Magnitsky: quais as consequências e como fica a relação EUA-Brasil | CNN Brasil
O Brasil não possui meios para retaliar a aplicação da Lei Magnitsky pelos Estados Unidos, conforme análise de Vitelio Brustolin, professor de relações internacionais da Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) e pesquisador de Harvard.
cnnbrasil.com.br
Sem respaldo, Lei Magnitsky se impõe por hegemonia dos EUA
A prática não condiz com os fundamentos do Direito Penal Internacional, mas segue sendo aplicada porque eles detêm mecanismos que garantem a efetividade das penalidades, como os sistemas financeiros e de cartões de crédito. Alexandre de Moraes foi sancionado pela Lei Magnitsky pelo governo Trump
conjur.com.br
Magnitsky: o que é a lei que EUA usaram contra Alexandre de Moraes - BBC News Brasil
Em 9 de julho, Trump anunciou tarifas de 50% contra produtos brasileiros; em 15 de julho, o governo Trump anunciou investigação sobre o que chamou de práticas comerciais "desleais" do Brasil; e, no dia 18, o secretário de Estado americano, Marco Rubio, anunciou a revogação do visto americano do ministro Alexandre de Moraes e de seus familiares e "aliados". ... Legenda da foto, Sanções norte-americanas a Moraes são uma das pautas mais defendidas por apoiadores de Bolsonaro · Aprovada durante o governo de Barack Obama, em 2012, a Lei Magnitsky foi criada para punir autoridades russas envolvidas na morte do advogado Sergei Magnitsky, que denunciou um esquema de corrupção estatal e morreu sob custódia em Moscou.
bbc.com
Lei Magnitsky: visto revogado prenuncia sanção maior contra Moraes; entenda
A revogação dos vistos para os Estados Unidos de ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) é um prenúncio da aplicação de uma lei ainda mais penosa, a Magnitsky, considerada quase uma ''morte financeira'' de um pessoa, analisou a professora de Direito Internacional, Priscila Caneparo, ao UOL News deste sábado (19). O secretário dos Estados Unidos, Marco Rubio, anunciou ontem (18) a revogação dos vistos dos ministros, bem como de seus familiares próximos, após a Corte tomar medidas restritivas ao ex-presidente Jair Bolsonaro.
noticias.uol.com.br
Lei Magnitsky é aplicada contra Alexandre de Moraes
O ministro Alexandre de Moraes determinou a abertura do inquérito em face de Eduardo Bolsonaro para apuração da suposta prática dos crimes de: a) coação no curso do processo (art. 344 do Código Penal);
cj.estrategia.com
Magnitsky: Brasil não tem leis similares para responder EUA; Lei da Reciprocidade não justifica medidas unilaterais
Já a Lei Antiterrorismo brasileira tem um caráter penal e processual, voltado à repressão de atos terroristas praticados no Brasil ou que afetem interesses brasileiros.
g1.globo.com
Relatório aponta violação de direitos fundamentais de detentos | Radioagência Nacional
As autoridades vivem uma realidade na qual os familiares não vivem. A lei é bonita no papel. A partir do momento que ela vai ser transferida para a prática, ela totalmente. Então é onde a gente perde a dignidade de ser um visitante. Onde o filho perde a dignidade de ser um filho, de passar o dia inteiro com o pai.
agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br
Plano Nacional para o Enfrentamento do Estado de Coisas Inconstitucional
41 DIAS, Camila Nunes; RIBEIRO, Natália Caruso. O deslocamento da prisão em três Comissões Parlamentares de Inqué- ritos (CPIs) e sua centralidade na conformação de redes criminais transnacionais. Revista Brasileira de Sociologia, Porto Alegre, v. 7, n. 17, 2019.
gov.br
Violações aos direitos humanos dos encarcerados no Brasil: perspectiva humanitária e tratados internacionais | Jusbrasil
Uma grave violação aos direitos humanos bem presente no cenário prisional brasileiro é cometida face aos presos provisórios, que têm ultrapassado – em muito – seu prazo de prisão preventiva. Nesse ínterim, ficam – sem o aparato da lei e, portanto, ilegalmente – reclusos, aguardando julgamento em três, quatro e até quinze anos17.
jusbrasil.com.br
COLETÂNEA DIREITOS HUMANOS, CONTROLE DE CONVENCIONALIDADE E
Estado de investigar, processar, punir e reparar violações aos direitos humanos.
cnj.jus.br
Violador de direitos humanos - Revista Oeste
No caso do ministro togado, ele passou a ser tratado como “violador de direitos humanos”. Um dos comunicados oficiais mais recentes, divulgado logo depois da prisão do ex-presidente Jair Bolsonaro, levou um recado direto: “Os Estados Unidos responsabilizarão todos aqueles que colaborarem” com ele. A frase foi interpretada pelos ministros mais próximos a Moraes como um aviso de que também poderão ser enquadrados em sanções severas — a maioria já perdeu o visto americano. O ministro Alexandre de Moraes, já sancionado pelos Estados Unidos por violações de direitos humanos, continua usando as instituições brasileiras para silenciar a oposição e ameaçar a democracia.
revistaoeste.com
Defensoria Pública: violação de direitos aumenta em presídios de SP | Agência Brasil
A defensoria lembra a Recomendação nº 62/2020 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ) indicava “adoção de medidas preventivas à propagação da infecção pelo novo coronavírus no âmbito dos estabelecimentos do sistema prisional, inclusive com a substituição da prisão em unidades prisionais por prisão domiciliar para grupos mais vulneráveis e crimes praticados sem grave ameaça ou violência”.
agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br
O agravamento das violações de direitos humanos no sistema prisional¹ - ITTC - Instituto Terra, Trabalho e Cidadania
O mesmo se observa quanto à situação de mulheres gestantes, lactantes ou mães com filhos de até 12 anos, em que a liberdade ou, no mínimo, a prisão domiciliar deveria ser a regra. Segundo o Marco Legal da Primeira Infância (Lei nº 13.257/2016), essa garantia tem como objetivo proteger o direito do nascituro a uma gestação distante do ambiente carcerário e da criança a ter proximidade com a mãe em uma fase tão crítica de seu desenvolvimento.
ittc.org.br
Sistema prisional é uma das maiores violações de direitos humanos no Brasil, diz presidente do STF e do CNJ - Portal CNJ
Compartilhe“O sistema prisional brasileiro é, talvez, um dos temas mais difíceis e complexos e uma das maiores violações de direitos humanos que ocorre no Brasil”. A afirmação do presidente do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) e do Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ), ministro Luís Roberto Barroso, na tarde desta sexta-feira (27/10), chamou atenção para a urgência […]
cnj.jus.br
Familiares criticam 'ilegalidades' na prisão dos manifestantes de 8 de janeiro — Senado Notícias
A Comissão de Segurança Pública (CSP) realizou nesta quinta-feira (13) audiência pública interativa para ouvir familiares e defensores dos presos nos atos de 8 de janeiro. Eles apontaram a ocorrência de ilegalidades e de violações de direitos humanos na detenção dos manifestantes nas penitenciárias da Papuda e Colmeia [feminino], em Brasília.
www12.senado.leg.br
Relatório da Situação dos Direitos Humanos no Brasil (2021)
oas.org
CP - Código Penal, art. 69
Redação anterior (original): [Interdições de direitos Art.
legjur.com
CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS
No Relatório de Mérito No. 91/08, a Comissão concluiu que o Estado era responsável pelas violações
midia.mpf.mp.br
Ano 4 (2018), nº 2, 465-477 V SEMANA DO CONHECIMENTO DO UNIVEM
pois, havendo viabilidade, ao invés da prisão domiciliar, haveria
cidp.pt
1 CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS
Portugal (expediente de prova, folhas 144-145); e Ofício SJU/GAB, de 1o de dezembro de 1994 (expediente de ... 99 O Estado reconheceu que “as condutas perpetradas por agentes públicos durante incursões policiais na Favela · Nova Brasília, em 18 de outubro de 1994 e em 8 de maio de 1995 e consubstanciadas, especificamente, no ... homicídio de 26 (vinte e seis) pessoas e na violência sexual de outras três, representam violações aos artigos 4.1 e
corteidh.or.cr
STF tem na pauta casos sobre violações de direitos no sistema prisional | CNN Brasil
Que juízes estabeleçam, quando possível, penas alternativas à prisão.
cnnbrasil.com.br
Human Rights and Anti-Corruption Sanctions: The Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
Some Members of Congress criticized the action and stated that the President had not provided advance justification to appropriate congressional committees regarding the decision, as is required by the Global Magnitsky Act (22 U.S.C. §10102(g)). The current Trump Administration has to date designated one foreign person under E.O. 13818. In July 2025, OFAC designated Brazilian Federal Supreme Court justice Alexandre de Moraes in connection with human rights abuse, drawing polarized responses from some Members of Congress (for background and discussion of congressional reactions, see CRS Report R46236, Brazil: Background and U.S.
congress.gov
Magnitsky Act - Wikipedia
The Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, enacted in 2016 as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, extends the original act’s framework to sanction foreign officials worldwide for human rights violations or significant corruption, authorizing asset freezes and U.S.
en.wikipedia.org
The Global Magnitsky Sanctions Program - United States Department of State
July 30, 2025 Sanctioning Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes for Serious Human Rights Abuse · Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Report 2023
state.gov
Treasury Sanctions Alexandre de Moraes | U.S. Department of the Treasury
WASHINGTON — Today, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is sanctioning Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) justice Alexandre de Moraes (de Moraes), who has used his position to authorize arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppress freedom of expression.
home.treasury.gov
Public statement: Alarming and Unacceptable Misuse of the Magnitsky Act
Transparency International – Brazil finds the selective use of the “Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act” for political and economic purposes both alarming and unacceptable. This practice has become increasingly common under the current Trump administration.
transparenciainternacional.org.br
What Is Magnitsky Act? The US Law Behind Sanctions On Brazilian Judge Alexandre de Moraes | World News - Times Now
The US sanctioned Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes under the Global Magnitsky Act, accusing him of human rights abuses and targeting Bolsonaro. Moraes is leading Bolsonaro’s coup-related case. Trump responded by imposing tariffs on Brazil, calling the prosecution a “witch hunt” against his political ally., World News, Times Now
timesnownews.com
U.S. sanctions Brazilian Justice Alexandre de Moraes based on the Magnitsky Act - Brasil de Fato
The measure, published by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, is unprecedented in targeting a Brazilian magistrate and deepens the diplomatic crisis between the two countries. Created in 2012, the Magnitsky Act allows Washington to impose sanctions on foreign citizens accused of large-scale corruption or serious human rights violations.
brasildefato.com.br
The Magnitsky Act: Scope, Applications, and Repercussions for Brazilian Citizens | PLG International Lawyers E.E.I.G.
Application of the Magnitsky Act to Brazilian nationals respects Brazilian sovereignty: it has no direct extraterritorial effect on civil or political rights within Brazil. Nevertheless, its practical effects can be far-reaching internationally, especially in financial operations, global reputation, and international mobility of the sanctioned individual.
plg.eu.com
Human Rights First Deplores Use of Global Magnitsky Sanctions to Support Impunity for Political Allies | Human Rights First
Washington, D.C. – Human Rights First regrets that the Trump administration’s first use of Global Magnitsky sanctions, which targeted the Brazilian Supreme Court justice Alexandre de Moraes for alleged arbitrary detention, served primarily to highlight the administration’s pursuit of impunity for close political allies.
humanrightsfirst.org
US imposes sanctions on Brazilian high court judge | Reuters
July 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. on Wednesday imposed sanctions on a Brazilian Supreme Court justice overseeing the trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro, accusing the judge of authorizing arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppressing freedom of expression.
reuters.com
The Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act: Scope, Implementation, and Considerations for Congress | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
'You see, the Americans are coming after us,' when, in fact, all we were doing was holding accountable a number of individuals for abuses of human rights and for corruption."69 · Global Magnitsky's standing global authority may also allow the United States to sanction human rights abusers or persons engaged in corruption who are nationals of countries with which the United States has important bilateral relationships and for which it may be reluctant to establish a country-specific sanctions regime that more broadly indicts an entire country or implies failings of its government.
congress.gov
Expert explains: Magnitsky Act works through hegemony, as the US controls the global financial system and payment methods (cards)
The Magnitsky Act, a U.S. government tool for sanctioning foreign individuals accused of human rights violations and corruption, operates globally not because of legal consensus, but because of U.S. hegemony over the global financial infrastructure. According to an expert analysis published by the Consultor Jurídico website, the ability to apply penalties outside its territory is due to the U.S.'s control over payment systems and international transactions, making it nearly impossible for targets to circumvent the restrictions.
en.clickpetroleoegas.com.br
Undue imposition of Magnitsky Act sanctions — Ministério das Relações Exteriores
The Brazilian Government receives with profound indignation the announcement, made by the U. S. Government, of the imposition of Magnitsky Act sanctions on the wife of Justice Alexandre de Moraes and on an institute linked to him. In a new attempt of undue interference in Brazilian internal affairs, the U.S.
gov.br
What drives the use of the US Magnitsky Act against STF minister Alexandre de Moraes and Viviane Barci
The United States government announced sanctions under the Magnitsky Act against Supreme Federal Court Minister Alexandre de Moraes. The measure comes amid diplomatic tensions between Washington and Brasília. American authorities justify the action with accusations of serious human rights violations.
mixvale.com.br
What is the Magnitsky Act: US Assessment Against Rights Violators and Corrupters
The Magnitsky Act, a U.S. law passed in 2012, allows the United States to impose sanctions on individuals and entities accused of serious human rights violations or corruption, such as asset freezes, account seizures, and entry bans. Named after Russian lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, who exposed tax fraud and died in a Moscow prison in 2009, the law gained global reach in 2016. Applied to figures from various countries, it has sparked debates about its effectiveness and diplomatic implications. In Brazil, speculation about its use against judicial authorities has reignited discussions on sovereignty and fundamental rights.
mixvale.com.br
